(HIMA PDIA NEWS) Thursday, March 20, 2025 - In order to increase academic and researchers' understanding of the Publication Standards in the Journal of Reported, TTS Series 3 raised the theme "POV Editor and Reviewer of the SCOPUS Journal of Representation" in academic discussions aimed at providing insight into the editorial process and article assessment in the reputation journal.
The event which was held online through Zoom presented Saarce Elsye Hatane, SE., M.BA., Ca., AK., CMA -Editor and Reviewer in various Journal of Scopus Q1/Q2, Lecturers of Petra Christian University, and PDIA students Universitas Airlangga. As a moderator, present Agung Prasetyo Nugroho Wicaksono, SE., MA, who is the Managing Editor of the Journal of Reviu Accounting and Finance (JRAK), Lecturer in Muhammadiyah University of Malang, as well as PDIA students Universitas Airlangga. This discussion took place from 08.00 to 11.00 WIB and was attended by academics, researchers, and students who wanted to understand more about publication strategies in the reputable journal.
In his presentation, Saarce Elsye Hatane explained in depth how the quality standards in the journals of Scopus Q1/Q2 were applied as well as various challenges faced by the authors in the publication process. "The strict peer-review process aims to ensure that each article has a significant academic contribution and meets research ethical standards," he said.
Some crucial aspects discussed in this session include:
1. The importance of seeing call for papers so that articles are in accordance with journal coverage.
2. Reviewing at least 50 articles with 80% of references from the last five years to ensure the relevance and novelty of research.
3. Understand the number of publications in certain journals to identify publication opportunities.
4. Preparation of submission titles that are not too long to make it more attractive to the editor and reviewer.
5. Explanation of step by step from the journal management process, including the division of the work of the editor.
6. Challenges in waiting for responses from the reviewer, which often takes a long time.
7. The importance of writing articles with perspective as a reviewer to ensure academic quality and originality of research.
Interactive discussion is an interesting part of this event, where participants are given the opportunity to ask direct questions related to the strategy of penetrating the journal reputation, challenges in dealing with revisions from the reviewer, to tips in improving the quality of manuscripts. Moderator, Agung Prasetyo Nugroho Wicaksono, too
