Evaluation on the performance of lecturers in guardianship (as guardian lecturers) is carried out every semester regularly. This evaluation is very useful in maintaining the quality of guardianship activities that support teaching and learning activities. Students as respondents provide an assessment through a questionnaire in the online cybercampus system. The components included in the assessment are whether the guardianship and guidance carried out by the lecturer is beneficial in: (1) academic planning and the course selection, (2) solving student's academic problems, (3) solving student's non-academic problems, ( 4) giving motivation to students, and (4) monitoring theses or final assignments. This evaluation used 1 to 4 scale, i.e. 1 is poor, 2 is fair, 3 is good and 4 is excellent.
Bachelor of Development Economics Programme
The results of the evaluation given by bachelor degree students in economics program showed that the role of the lecturer in these various components is between good-excellent, with an average value of each component is above 3. The highest score was reached by the indicator stating that the lecturer guardianship is useful in students' academic planning, solving their academic problems, and giving the motivations respectively.
Master of Economics Programme
Overall, the master of economics students gave a good/excellent mark to their lecturer as a guardian since the scores were more than 3.00. They claimed that the guardianship was useful in student's academic planning, giving motivation to the students, and solving student's academic problems respectively.
Doctoral of Economics Programme
The role of lecturers in guardianships to the doctoral students in economics was very good. This was because the average of all those criteria got a high score, ie more than 3.00 meaning that it was good or excellent. The students appreciated them because they were very helpful in student's academic planning, solving the student's academic problems, and giving motivations to students respectively.
