Course unit title
|
Business Ethics and Creating Share Value
|
Course unit code
|
ETE601
|
Type of course unit (compulsory, optional)
|
Compulsory
|
Level of course unit (according to EQF: first cycle Bachelor, second cycle Master)
|
Level 7 – Second Cycle Degree (Master)
|
Year of study when the course unit s delivered (if applicable)
|
-
|
Semester/trimester when the course unit is delivered
|
2
|
Number of ECTS credits allocated
|
4.8
|
Name of lecturer(s)
|
- Dr. Gancar Candra Premananto, SE., MSi.
- Prof. Dr. Ida Bagus Rachmadi Supancana, SH., MH.
- Ahmad Rizki Sridadi, Dr., SH., MM., MH.
|
Learning outcomes of the course unit
|
Graduate Learning Outcomes
- Knowledge
- Students are able to use tools for management practices (A2)
- General Skill
- Students are able to implement knowledge and understanding the organizational management including environmental analysis, processes, procedures, and effective management practices (B1)
- Students are able to create product prototypes individually or in groups based on relevant entrepreneurial theories and concepts that always refers to scientific rules, procedures, and academic ethics (B2)
- Students are able to use information technology in implementing their expertise (B3)
- Students are able to make good management decisions based on critical and systematic data analysis both individually and team management (B4)
- Students are able to build good social networks with internal and external parties in accomplishing their duties (B5)
- Specific Skill
- Students are able to construct new ideas or critical perspectives in perceiving the management concepts and business organization problems (C2)
- Students are able to design organizational and business development plans (C3)
- Students are able to implement effective communication skills in the context of delivering empirical and theoretical arguments in the field of management (C4)
- Attitude
- Students have integrity as religious human beings who uphold human, moral, and ethical values (D1)
- Students are able to develop discipline, responsibility, cooperation, in order to prioritize the concerns of community, nation, and state based on Pancasila (D2)
- Students are able to carry out critical self-reflection related to self-understanding, openness, and sensitivity regarding to the differences and shifts in personal and organizational environments (D3)
- Students are able to show attitudes as independent citizens and entrepreneur (D4)
Course Learning Outcomes
After completing this course, students are expected to:
- Be able to elaborate business ethics issues in various contexts
- Be able to find solutions from various management alternatives related to ethics
- Be able to analyze situations with an ethical perspective in the business world they are involved in
- Be able to explain CSR and the power behind it, implement the framework of CSR, as well as CSR map along with its challenges
- Be able to define GCG meaning and describe its implementation, impact and challenge in Indonesia,
Students are expected to be able to analyze legal and ethical signs that need to be recognized in information technology field that keep growing continuously.
|
Mode of delivery (face-to-face, distance learning)
|
Distance Learning (current status due to COVID-19 pandemic)
|
Prerequisites and co-requisites (if applicable)
|
-
|
Course content
|
Topic 1 – Business and Ethics
- What morality and moral standards mean
- The meaning of Ethics and Business Ethics and their issues.
- Moral reasoning
- Stages of moral development
- Kohrlberg's study and business ethics
Topic 2 – Business Ethics: Enron and Microsoft
Topic 3 – Ethics Principle
- Ethical principles and theories (deontology and teleology)
- Case discussion on page 149 and page 151 (V)
Topic 4 – Ethics Principle
- Virtue ethics
- The ethics of care (page 125)
Topic 5 – Ethics in Production and Marketing Consumer Products
Topic 6 – The Concepts of Corporate Social Responsibility
- Corporate Social Responsibility concept
- Triple bottom line
Topic 7 – Corporate Social Responsibility on Case Discussion
- Ethics and conflict of interest
- Case:
https://hbr.org/2019/01/how-csr-managers-can-inspire-other-leaders-to-act-on-sustainability
https://hbr.org/2015/01/the-truth-about-csr
Topic 8 – Innovation on Corporate Social Responsibility
Topic 9 – Corporate Social Responsibility Accountability
Topic 10 – Cyber Ethics
- Ethical aspects of information technology, best practices, and implementation in Indonesia
Topic 11 – Cyber Law
- Legal aspects of Information Technology – International dan National regulations
Topic 12 – Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)
- CSR definitions
- CSR basic concepts
- CSR rationales and driving forces
- Framework for CSR initiatives
- CSR best practices
Topic 13 – Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)
- CSR mapping in Indonesia
- CSR update in Indonesia and the challenges ahead
Topic 14 – USR Presentation Worth Publication
|
Recommended or required reading and other learning resources/tools
|
Main References
- Velasquez, Manuel G. (2014). Business Ethics - Concepts and Cases 7th Edition. USE: Pearson New International Edition V – (required reading)
- Joseph, W Weiss. (2009). Business Ethics, A Stakeholder and Issues Management Approach with Cases 5th Edition. Cengage Learning (JW)
- Sonny Sukada, Pamadi Wibowo, Katamsi Ginano, Jalal, Irpan Kadir, Taufik Rahman. (2006). Membumikan Bisnis Berkelanjutan - Memahami Konsep dan Praktik Tanggung Jawab Sosial Perusahaan. Indonesia Business Links (IBL) – (recommended reading)
- Komite Nasional Kebijakan Governance (KNKG), Pedoman Good Corporate Governance Indonesia (2006) – (recommended reading)
Other References
- Fisher, Collin, and Allan Lovell. (2003). Business Ethics and Values. Harlow, England: Prentice Hall (Lovell)
- Articles or clippings and journals and other readings distributed to students
|
Planned learning activities and teaching methods
|
This course is conducted online with combination of classical lectures, presentations, interactive discussions, and case study analysis. The purpose of using various teaching methods is to encourage the students to contribute in learning process through structured classroom activities.
|
Language of instruction
|
Bahasa Indonesia
|
Assessment methods and criteria
|
- Assessment Methods
Mechanism
|
|
Grading Aspect
|
Weight
|
- Minimum attendance is 75%.
- Assignments are assigned individually or in group.
- Individual participation is assessed from the involvement and participation of students in class.
- Quiz is conducted without prior notice.
|
Individual Participation
|
30 %
|
Group Assignment
|
30 %
|
Midterm Exam
|
20 %
|
Final Exam
|
20 %
|
Total Score
|
100 %
|
- Assessment Criteria
Grade
|
Criteria
|
Analysis and Theory
|
Presentation
|
A
|
Students are analyzing problems and solutions properly by using all relevant theories and concepts
|
The powerpoint presentation is excellent, systematic, attractive, comprehensible, and presenters proficient the materials
|
AB
|
Students are analyzing problems and solutions well by using almost all relevant theories and concepts
|
The powerpoint presentation is great, systematic, interesting, understandable, and presenters competent to present
|
B
|
Students are analyzing problems and solutions well by using several relevant theories and concepts
|
The powerpoint presentation is good and systematic, but the presenters do not quite master the material well even if it is still easy to understand
|
BC
|
Students are not analyzing problems and solutions properly, but several relevant theories and concepts are used
|
The powerpoint presentation is not quite good but still systematic, the presenters do not quite master the material well and it is hard to understand
|
C
|
Students are not analyzing neither problems nor solutions properly, but several relevant theories and concepts are used
|
The powerpoint presentation is not quite flattering and systematic. The presenter does not really master the materials so that the presentation is quite difficult to understand
|
D/E
|
Students are not analyzing problems and solutions properly. Relevant theories and concepts are not used at all
|
The power point presentation is not good and systematic. The presenter does not understand the materials et all so that the presentation is hard to understand
|
|