Lecturer Evaluation on Thesis Supervision Department of Economics Evaluation on the lecturer's performance in supervising the student’s thesis is carried out every semester regularly. This evaluation is very useful in understanding the perceptions of the students during their study. Students as respondents provide an assessment through a questionnaire in the online cybercampus system. There are ten questions for this evaluation including the supervisor’s roles in: (1) formulating the title of the thesis; (2) directing students on how to trace scientific information ( printed and electronic); (3) directing students to write a thesis in good and correct language; (4) directing students to write a thesis according to applicable guidelines; (5) directing students to carry out research according to the proposal; (6) solving problems in the implementation of thesis research; (7) accessing the thesis research facilities; (8) finishing the thesis ontime; (9) publishing the results of thesis into a reputable journal; and (10) assisting the thesis according to the lecturer’s expertise. Furthermore, this evaluation used 1 to 4 scale, i.e. 1 is poor 2 is fair, 3 is good and 4 is excellent. Bachelor Degree of Economics Programme In general, the evaluation of the final thesis supervision of the bachelor of development economics programme shows good results because it has an average score of above 3. Although in the odd semester 2020/2021 it has decreased. This is based on the role of the lecturer in guiding the thesis in good condition. Master of Economics Programme In general, the evaluation of the final thesis supervision of the master of economics programme shows good results because it has an average score of above 3. This is based on the role of the lecturer in guiding the thesis in good condition. In the odd semester 2020/2021 it has decreased, but there is an increase in the next period. Doctoral Degree of Economics Programme In general, the evaluation of the final thesis supervision of the doctoral degree of economics programme shows good results because it has an average score of above 3. This is based on the role of the lecturer in guiding the thesis in good condition. Seen from each semester, the graph shows that there is an increase in the next period.