Lecturer Evaluation on Teaching Process Department of Accounting

Evaluation of lecturer performance in the process of teaching and learning activities is carried out every semester regularly. This evaluation is very useful in maintaining the quality of teaching and learning activities in the academic stage. Students as respondents provide an assessment through a questionnaire in the online cyber campus system. The performance of the lecturers is evaluated by three categories, i.e. lecturer a planner, an executor, and an evaluator in teaching and learning activities using scale 1-4; 1 is poor, 2 is fair, 3 is good and 4 is excellent.

Bachelor of Accounting Program

In general, the performance of bachelor of accounting programme lecturers during that period was included in the good category because they had an average score of 3. The figure shows an increasing trend. This means that the bachelor of accounting programme lecturers have more capabilities in planning, executing, and evaluating lecture activities. During the transition period of the 2019/2020 odd semester to the next semester, the performance of lecturers tends to have good performance in the pandemic era. The infrastructure is ready to facilitate students and lecturers, for example, with the “HEBAT UNAIR” e-learning web as a forum to implement online learning. Furthermore, the result indicates that the online learning used by the department effectively supports the teaching process in the pandemic era.

Master of Accounting Program Screen_Shot_2022-07-28_at_12.05.42.png

The performance of the accounting master program lecturer can plan, implement, and evaluate lecture activities well in the pandemic era. In general, the performance of the accounting master’s program lecturers during that period was in the good-excellent category because they had an average score of 3. The figure shows an increasing trend. During the transition period in the pandemic era, there was a slight increase (Even Semester 2019/2020). However, the lecturers’ performance is still good, supported by the “HEBAT UNAIR” e-learning web. Furthermore, these results indicate that online learning with the web is used by the department effectively in the teaching process in the pandemic era.

Doctoral of Accounting Program

Screen_Shot_2022-07-28_at_12.06.09.png

Overall, the performance of the doctoral of accounting programme lecturers during that period was in the good-excellent category because they had an average score of 3. It means that the lecturers were very good in planning, executing, and evaluating the courses in the doctoral of accounting programme. The graph shows that there is an increase in the next period. Supported by the ready infrastructure, namely “HEBAT UNAIR” e-learning, students and lecturers can easily carry out online learning in the pandemic era. Furthermore, the result indicates that the online learning used by the department effectively supports the teaching process in the pandemic era.

Lecturer Evaluation on Academic Counsellor Department of Accounting

Evaluation on the performance of lecturers as academic counsellor is carried out every semester regularly. This evaluation is very useful in maintaining the quality of guardianship activities that supports teaching and learning activities. Students as respondents provide an assessment through a questionnaire in the online cybercampus system. The components included in the assessment are whether the guidance carried out by the lecturer is beneficial in: (1) academic planning and the courses selection, (2) solving student’s academic problems, (3) solving student’s non-academic problems, (4) giving motivation to students, and (4) monitoring thesis or final assignments. This evaluation used 1 to 4 scale, i.e. 1 is poor 2 is fair, 3 is good and 4 is excellent.

Bachelor of Accounting Program

Screen_Shot_2022-07-28_at_12.06.43.png

The results of the evaluation given by bachelor degree students in the accounting programme showed that the role of the lecturer in these various components is between good-excellent, with an average value of each component is above 3. The graph shows that there is an increase in the next period. The highest score was reached by the indicator stating that the lecturer guardianship is useful in student’s academic planning, solving their academic problems, and solving student’s non-academic problems.

Master of Accounting Program

Screen_Shot_2022-07-28_at_12.07.18.png

Overall, the results of the evaluation given by master degree students in the accounting programme showed that the role of the lecturer in these various components is between good-excellent, with an average value of each component is above 3. The graph shows that there is an increase in the next period. The highest score was reached by the indicator stating that the lecturer guardianship is useful in student’s academic planning, solving their academic problems, and useful in giving motivation to students.

Doctoral of Accounting Program

Screen_Shot_2022-07-28_at_12.08.50.png

The role of lecturers in guardianships to the doctoral students in the accounting program was very good. This was because the average of all those criterias got a high score, i.e. more than 3.00 meaning that was good or excellent. The students appreciated them because they were very helpful in student’s academic planning, solving the student’s academic problems, and giving motivations to students respectively.

Evaluation on Student’s Learning Experiences

Department of Accounting

Evaluation on the student’s learning experiences is carried out every semester regularly. This evaluation is very useful in understanding the perceptions of the students during their study. Students as respondents provide an assessment through a questionnaire in the online cybercampus system. There are four components for this evaluation:

student’s attributes including the role of curriculum and learning programs in improving student’s skills such as the abilities of analysis, submission of opinions in writing and oral, information technology, team working, self-management (e.g. time management), and personal development;
the role of lecturers in the learning process (in general) including the ability of the lecturers in motivating their students to complete their study well, transferring the knowledge, encouraging students to be active in the class, guiding the students to finish their thesis, and assisting the students as a lecturer guardian;
resource supports in learning process such as library facilities, internet connections, learning media, as well as academic and financial services;
student affairs and others including the facilities provided by the university to improve their talents, interests, and critical thinking.

This evaluation used 1 to 4 scale, i.e. 1 is poor 2 is fair, 3 is good and 4 is excellent.

Bachelor of Accounting Program

Screen_Shot_2022-07-28_at_12.09.41.png

The chart illustrates that the students of the Bachelor of Accounting Programme had a good experience during their study for all those criteria. This was because the average score of each category was more than 3.00 indicating a good-excellent perception. The graph shows that there is an increase in the next period.

Master of Accounting Program

Screen_Shot_2022-07-28_at_12.10.35.png

The chart illustrates that the students of the Master of Accounting Programme had a good experience during their study for all those criteria. This was because the average score of each category was more than 3.00 indicating a good-excellent perception. It can be seen in the table, the diagram of each point tends to be constant and stable.

Doctoral of Accounting Program

Screen_Shot_2022-07-28_at_12.11.18.png

The chart illustrates that the students of the Doctoral of Accounting Science Programme had a good experience during their study for all those criteria. This was because the average score of each category was more than 3.00 indicating a good-excellent perception. It can be seen in the table, the graph shows that there is an increase in the next period.

Lecturer Evaluation on Thesis Supervision Department of Accounting

Evaluation on the lecturer’s performance in supervising the student’s thesis is carried out every semester regularly. This evaluation is very useful in understanding the perceptions of the students during their study. Students as respondents provide an assessment through a questionnaire in the online cybercampus system. There are ten questions for this evaluation including the supervisor’s roles in: (1) formulating the title of the thesis; (2) directing students on how to trace scientific information ( printed and electronic); (3) directing students to write a thesis in good and correct language; (4) directing students to write a thesis according to applicable guidelines; (5) directing students to carry out research according to the proposal; (6) solving problems in the implementation of thesis research; (7) accessing the thesis research facilities; (8) finishing the thesis ontime; (9) publishing the results of thesis into a reputable journal; and (10) assisting the thesis according to the lecturer’s expertise. Furthermore, this evaluation used 1 to 4 scale, i.e. 1 is poor 2 is fair, 3 is good and 4 is excellent.

Bachelor of Accounting Program

Screen_Shot_2022-07-28_at_12.12.48.png

In general, the evaluation of the final thesis supervision of the bachelor of accounting program shows good results because it has an average score of above 3. This is based on the role of the lecturer in guiding the thesis in good condition. Seen from each semester, the graph shows that there is an increase in the next period.

.

Master of Accounting Program

Screen_Shot_2022-07-28_at_12.13.46.png

In general, the evaluation of the final thesis supervision of the master of accounting shows good results because it has an average score of above 3. Seen from each semester, the graph shows that there is an increase in the next period.

Doctoral of Accounting Program

Screen_Shot_2022-07-28_at_12.14.29.png

In general, the evaluation of the final thesis supervision of the doctoral of accounting shows good results because it has an average score of above 3. Seen from each semester, the graph shows that there is an increase in the next period.

Stakeholders’ Satisfaction Survey Department of Accounting

This survey is conducted annually to evaluate the performance of the graduates. There are six categories for this evaluation, i.e. integrity, professionalism, knowledge, leadership, team working, and foreign language including English. Evaluation of integrity aspects includes an assessment of the graduate’s identities in their job. The assessment is illustrated from several aspects that are asked to stakeholders, i.e discipline, honesty, work motivation and work ethic. Moreover, the aspects of professionalism and knowledge are aimed to identify the readiness of graduates to work. Specifically, the questions include some components such as the ability to implement their skills or science in work, work productivity, innovation, the ability to solve problems at work, the ability to adapt to the work environment and regarding responses to market needs. Furthermore, this evaluation used 1 to 4 scale, i.e. 1 is poor 2 is fair, 3 is good and 4 is excellent.

Bachelor of Accounting Program

Screen_Shot_2022-07-28_at_12.15.04.png

The bachelor of accounting programme is rated as good-excellent (scale above 3.00) in terms of integrity (ethics and morals), professionalism (skills in the field of science), knowledge, leadership, team working, and English language skills. Seen from each semester has a positive trend, which is increasing even though it is not significant.

Master of Accounting Program

Screen_Shot_2022-07-28_at_12.15.38.png

The master of accounting programme is rated as good-excellent (scale above 3.00) in terms of integrity (ethics and morals), professionalism (skills in the field of science), knowledge, leadership, team working, and English language skills. Seen from each semester has a positive trend, which is constantly increasing.

Doctoral of Accounting Program

Screen_Shot_2022-07-28_at_12.16.18.png

The doctoral accounting program is rated as good-excellent (scale above 3.00) in terms of integrity (ethics and morals), professionalism (skills in the field of science), knowledge, leadership, team working, and English language skills. Seen from each semester has a positive trend, which is constantly increasing.

Evaluation on the Head of Department Department of Accounting

The performance of the head of department is evaluated every semester. The evaluation was conducted using a scale of 1-4, with categories 1 less, 2 enough, 3 good, and 4 very good. It is useful for maintaining the performance of the head of department in managing and developing the department. This evaluation uses several indicators, with 7 main indicators. The following are the performance indicators of the department head.

Screen_Shot_2022-07-28_at_12.32.13.png

In general, the performance of the department head is good, the average is above 3. The points on the performance of the department head (strategy and vision, leadership in research, leadership in community service, collaborative transformational leadership, leadership in teaching process, interpersonal skills, fair and efficient management) tend to be constant and stagnant. Leadership in community service has the highest score every semester. This shows that the department head has succeeded in leading community services.

Evaluation on Administrative Staffs Department of Accounting

Evaluation on the administrative staff of the department is carried out twice a year, at the end of the odd and even semesters. There are five sub-sections that are evaluated every semester, namely the academic sub-division, finance sub-division, student sub-division, infrastructure sub-division, and Information System Unit. The five sub-division require evaluation to maintain and improve service quality.

Screen_Shot_2022-07-28_at_12.32.50.png

The performance of administrative staff has a positive trend. It is considered good with an average of more than 3 per semester. From all of the sub-divisions, the infrastructure sub-division is the division that is considered to provide the best service. Performance of the administrative staff is assessed based on the ease, speed, and proficiency in services related to the students’ needs. In the 2019/2020 transition period, all services for students and lecturers are based online. All information related to learning activities is already using “HEBAT UNAIR” e-learning and the information related to students needs such as administration, it can be accessed using mawa.feb.unair.ac.id.

Learning Evaluation Report

BACKGROUND

FACULTY OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS

Jl.Airlangga 4-6 Surabaya

Quick Links:

Social media:

E-mail

Tel

Fax